55.9k views
4 votes
Respond to the following prompt by developing a claim and defending it with

evidence from BOTH sources:
Prompt: Identify and explain the relationship between the SCOTUS decision in
Marbury v. Madison (1803) and Alexander Hamilton's point of view in Federalist
Paper # 78.

1 Answer

2 votes

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Claim: The Supreme Court decision in Marbury v. Madison (1803) and Alexander Hamilton's point of view in Federalist Paper #78 both emphasize the importance of the judicial branch in maintaining the balance of power within the government and protecting the rights of citizens.

Evidence from Marbury v. Madison: In Marbury v. Madison, the Supreme Court established the principle of judicial review, which gives the courts the power to declare laws unconstitutional if they violate the Constitution. This decision reinforced the idea that the judiciary is a check on the power of the legislative and executive branches, ensuring that the government remains limited and that individual rights are protected.

Evidence from Federalist Paper #78: In Federalist Paper #78, Alexander Hamilton expresses his belief that the judiciary is an essential component of the federal government, serving as a bulwark against tyranny and oppression. He argues that the judiciary is well-suited to this role because it operates independently of the other branches, allowing it to make impartial and well-reasoned decisions. Hamilton also notes that the judiciary is essential to the maintenance of the rule of law, as it ensures that the government acts within the bounds of the Constitution.

In both Marbury v. Madison and Federalist Paper #78, the authors emphasize the crucial role of the judiciary in preserving the balance of power within the government and protecting the rights of citizens. Through the principle of judicial review and the independence of the judiciary, the Supreme Court and Hamilton both recognize the important role that the courts play in ensuring that the government remains limited and that individual rights are protected.

User Nicola Pezzotti
by
8.1k points