9.4k views
0 votes
Using practical illustrations in politics, religion, medicine and/or law, explain why a value judgment, unlike a factual statement, will have no objective truth. What are the implications for the degree of certainty a critical thinker should accord such judgments? Your response should be between 500 and 600 words.



1 Answer

4 votes

in politics, different people may have different values and beliefs about issues such as taxation, social welfare programs, or foreign policy. One person may believe that higher taxes are necessary to fund social programs, while another person may believe that lower taxes are better for the economy.

In religion, different faiths may have different beliefs and values about the nature of the divine, the afterlife, or moral behavior. These beliefs are often based on subjective experiences or interpretations of religious texts, rather than on objective evidence.

In medicine, ethical dilemmas often involve conflicting values, such as the right to individual autonomy versus the need to protect public health. For example, a patient may refuse a life-saving medical treatment based on their personal beliefs, while a physician may believe that providing the treatment is necessary to save the patient's life.

Similarly, in law, judges may need to make decisions based on their interpretation of legal principles and values, such as the right to free speech or the right to a fair trial.

User Manish Sapariya
by
6.9k points