In "Rethinking the Wild", the author argues that the concept of wilderness, or preserving land as untouched by human hands, has become outdated. Instead, they propose a new approach to conservation that prioritizes both human needs and the needs of the environment. This perspective recognizes that human activity and land use are inevitable, and seeks to find ways to balance human needs with those of the environment.
Similarly, "Silent Spring" highlights the negative impacts of human activities, such as pesticide use, on the environment and wildlife. The book argues that humans must consider the long-term consequences of their actions, and that preserving the environment is crucial for the health and survival of both humans and wildlife.
In conclusion, based on these two texts, it can be argued that the needs of people and the needs of animals and the planet are not mutually exclusive. Rather, the texts suggest that finding a balance between the two is necessary for the long-term health and survival of both. The needs of people can be important, but not at the expense of the environment and wildlife.