Question

1 - What was Marbury vs. Madison? Explain.

2 - How did Marbury vs. Madison changed the government?
3 - Did Marbury vs. Madison meet Thomas Jefferson’s goals? Explain with evidence
from the text/video
4 - Did Thomas Jefferson meet his goals as President? Explain with evidence.

Answer 1

Marbury v. Madison was a Supreme Court case that established the principle of judicial review and strengthened the role of the Supreme Court. It did not meet Thomas Jefferson's goals and he did not fully achieve his goals as President.

Step-by-step explanation:

In 1803, the Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison established the principle of judicial review, which gave the court the power to review and potentially nullify the actions of Congress and the president. Chief Justice John Marshall struck a balance between asserting the Supreme Court’s authority and respecting the president’s authority by ruling in favor of William Marbury, who was entitled to his commission, but also declaring that the part of the Judiciary Act of 1789 granting the Court the power to issue writs of mandamus was unconstitutional.

Marbury v. Madison changed the government by significantly strengthening the role of the Supreme Court and establishing its power to interpret the Constitution. It gave the Court the final say on the constitutionality of laws and set a precedent for judicial review, which continues to shape the legal system today.

Marbury v. Madison did not meet Thomas Jefferson’s goals. Jefferson wanted to limit the power of the federal government and believed that state governments should have more power. The case reaffirmed the power of the federal government and expanded the authority of the Supreme Court, which went against Jefferson’s principles.

Thomas Jefferson did not fully meet his goals as President. While he successfully pursued some of his Republican ideals, such as reducing the size and power of the federal government and implementing policies to promote agriculture and western expansion, he faced challenges and compromises that prevented him from fully achieving his goals. For example, he was unable to eliminate the national debt and was criticized by some for expanding executive power, particularly in the Louisiana Purchase.

Answer 2

1- Marbury vs. Madison was a landmark case in American constitutional law, decided by the Supreme Court of the United States in 1803. The case centered on the question of whether the Supreme Court had the authority to declare a federal law unconstitutional. William Marbury had been appointed as a justice of the peace by President John Adams but had not been sworn in before the end of Adams' term. Marbury sued Secretary of State James Madison, asking the Supreme Court to issue a writ of mandamus ordering Madison to swear him in.

2- Marbury vs. Madison changed the government by establishing the principle of judicial review, which is the power of the courts to review the constitutionality of laws and executive actions. This decision solidified the power of the Supreme Court and gave it an important role in checking the actions of the other branches of government.

3- It is not clear whether Marbury vs. Madison met Thomas Jefferson's goals as there is no evidence that he had any direct involvement in the case. However, as a strong advocate of states' rights and a strict interpretation of the Constitution, Jefferson may have opposed the principle of judicial review established in the case.

4- Thomas Jefferson had several goals as President, including reducing the size and power of the federal government, promoting agricultural development, and expanding American territorial holdings. Whether he met these goals is a matter of historical debate, but evidence suggests that he was successful in reducing the size of the federal government and promoting westward expansion through the Louisiana Purchase. He faced challenges in fulfilling his goal of promoting agriculture, as the country faced economic difficulties during his presidency.

Step-by-step explanation: