Answer:
The Founding Fathers debated the pros and cons of state sovereignty versus federalism at length. The main argument for state sovereignty was that it provided a system of checks and balances between the states and the national government, preventing any one branch or state from becoming too powerful. The main argument against state sovereignty was that it could lead to a lack of uniformity between the states and could create a situation where the individual states were at odds with each other.
The main argument for federalism was that it would allow for a more unified system of government and would provide more protection for individual rights. The main argument against federalism was that it could lead to an overly powerful central government and could lead to a situation where individual states had no say in their own governance.
Step-by-step explanation:
Overall, the Founding Fathers argued the pros and cons of state sovereignty and federalism at length, and the debate is still ongoing today. Ultimately, the decision of whether to have a system of state sovereignty or federalism is largely dependent on the political and social situation of the nation in question.
Hope this helps! :)