Answer:
By giving farmers work as soldiers
Step-by-step explanation:
The best way a strong central government could have avoided Shays's Rebellion would have been by enacting laws making uprisings illegal. Shays's Rebellion was a result of a lack of representation and economic distress among farmers. The rebellion was a reaction to the government's inability to address these issues, and the farmers felt that the government had not been responsive to their needs.
Enacting laws making uprisings illegal would have been a proactive measure to prevent rebellion by addressing the root causes of discontent among the farmers. This could have been achieved through a number of means, such as providing financial relief to farmers, addressing land and property disputes, and ensuring that farmers had representation in government. By addressing these issues, the government would have been able to prevent the rebellion from occurring in the first place.
Additionally, a strong central government could have also avoided Shays's Rebellion by giving farmers work as soldiers, this could have helped in two ways, first, farmers could have had employment and income, which would have reduced economic distress, and second, farmers would have a sense of purpose and belonging, which would have reduced the feeling of being neglected by the government.
In summary, the best way a strong central government could have avoided Shays's Rebellion would have been by enacting laws making uprisings illegal, addressing the root causes of discontent among farmers, providing financial relief, addressing land and property disputes and ensuring that farmers had representation in government, Additionally, giving farmers work as soldiers could have also helped in avoiding the rebellion.