172k views
2 votes
Was The Blood and Iron Speech, Otto Von Bismark Conservative, Liberal, or Radical? Explain.

1 Answer

7 votes

Answer:

The "Blood and Iron" speech, delivered by Otto von Bismarck in 1862, is considered to be a conservative speech.

Step-by-step explanation:

Bismarck, who was appointed as the Prime Minister of Prussia in 1862, used the speech to advocate for the unification of Germany under a strong central government, and to argue against the liberal idea of a federation of independent states. He argued that the unification of Germany could only be achieved through "blood and iron," rather than through speeches and agreements.

In the speech, Bismarck also rejected the idea of popular sovereignty, which was a key tenet of liberal political thought. Instead, he argued that the role of government was to provide order and stability, and that this could only be achieved through a strong and centralized state.

Bismarck's ideas and actions were a reaction to the liberal and democratic movements that were sweeping Europe in the mid-19th century. He believed in a strong centralized state, with a powerful monarchy and a limited role for parliamentary democracy, which is a characteristic of conservative ideologies.

In conclusion, Bismarck's "Blood and Iron" speech reflects his conservative views and his rejection of liberal ideas of popular sovereignty and a federation of independent states.

User Rainer Schaack
by
7.7k points