195k views
2 votes
6. Why do you think that Pavlovian-conditioned

fish that were not shown the light (PAV-NL)
performed more poorly than the
unconditioned fish (UNP) when facing PAV-L
fish?
7. Do you think conditioning aggressiveness in
other types of animals or humans would show
similar results? (highlight/circle One) YES
or NO Explain your answer.
Explain:
8. In addition to conditioning, what other
explanations are possible for the finding that
winners
keep winning?

6. Why do you think that Pavlovian-conditioned fish that were not shown the light-example-1

1 Answer

4 votes

Answer:

6. It is likely that the Pavlovian-conditioned fish (PAV-NL) performed more poorly than the unconditioned fish (UNP) because the conditioned fish had not been exposed to the light stimulus and therefore had not developed the conditioned response.

7. Yes, conditioning aggressiveness in other types of animals or humans would likely show similar results. This is because conditioning is a learned behavior, and animals and humans can be conditioned to respond to certain stimuli in a certain way.

8. Other explanations for the finding that winners keep winning could include that they have better physical abilities, better strategies, or better access to resources. Additionally, winners may have a psychological advantage due to their past successes, which can lead to further success.

Step-by-step explanation:

User Axisnix
by
8.9k points