There are several problems that philosophers have historically had with the concept of monarchy, or rule by a single ruler or a small group of hereditary rulers. Some of these issues include:
Lack of accountability: Philosophers argue that monarchs are not accountable to the people and are not subject to the same checks and balances as other forms of government. This can lead to abuse of power and lack of representation for the common people.
Inefficiency: Philosophers have argued that monarchies are inefficient forms of government because they rely on the personal whims and caprices of the monarch, rather than on a system of laws and institutions.
Lack of representation: Philosophers have argued that monarchies do not provide adequate representation for all members of society, particularly those who are not part of the ruling elite.
Lack of innovation: Philosophers have argued that monarchies are often resistant to change and innovation, as they are more interested in maintaining the status quo than in promoting progress and development.
Lack of freedom: Philosophers have argued that monarchies are often oppressive, limiting the freedom and autonomy of the individual.
In summary, philosophers have had issues with monarchs because of their lack of accountability, inefficiency, lack of representation, lack of innovation and lack of freedom.