210k views
4 votes
Why is absolute freedom optimal for an individual and yet detrimental
to a society?

User Sverrisson
by
7.1k points

1 Answer

1 vote

Absolute freedom, where an individual is free to do whatever they want without any constraints or restrictions, can be optimal for the individual in the sense that they can fully express themselves and make their own choices without interference. However, this type of freedom can be detrimental to a society as a whole because it can lead to chaos and social disorder.

When individuals have absolute freedom, they may not take into account the well-being or rights of others. This can lead to individuals acting in ways that harm others or the community, such as engaging in criminal activities, disrupting public order, or neglecting their responsibilities. This can result in a society that is unsafe, unstable, and unsustainable in the long run.

In addition, absolute freedom can also lead to social inequality, as those who have more resources or power will be able to take advantage of the lack of constraints to further their own interests, to the detriment of others.

Therefore, societies often establish laws, regulations, and other forms of social constraints to balance the individual's freedom with the need for social order and fairness. This is often referred to as "ordered liberty," where individuals are free to pursue their own goals within the limits of the law and respect for the rights of others.

In summary, while absolute freedom may be optimal for an individual, it can be detrimental to a society as a whole because it can lead to chaos, social disorder, and inequality. A balance is needed between individual freedom and societal constraints in order to maintain order, fairness, and the general well-being of society.

User RunningRhetoric
by
8.0k points