Question

Why would control of the press be such an important issue for Hitler and the Nazi’s?

How do you think a lack of free press affected the outlook of the average German citizen?

PLEASE HELP IM SHORT ON TIME!!

Answer 1

Control of the press was important for Hitler and the Nazi Party because it allowed them to control the flow of information and manipulate public opinion in their favor. The Nazi regime used propaganda and censorship to shape the views and beliefs of the German population, and to suppress any opposing viewpoints or dissent. By controlling the media, the Nazi Party was able to present itself as a strong and successful government, and to portray its enemies and critics as threats to the nation.

A lack of free press can have a significant impact on the outlook of the average citizen, as it can limit their access to diverse perspectives and accurate information. In the case of Nazi Germany, the lack of a free press meant that the public was only exposed to the views and policies of the Nazi Party, and was not able to hear alternative viewpoints or to question the actions of the government. This may have contributed to the widespread support for the Nazi regime, as the public was not able to fully understand the consequences of its policies or the true nature of its ideology.

Answer 2

Hitler and the Nazi party saw media dominance as crucial to influencing public opinion and gaining support for their government. The Nazi party was especially worried about the power of the international press, thus it actively sought to stifle any coverage or criticism that was unfavorable of the regime abroad. The Nazi party was able to provide a one-sided version of events and pass off its propaganda as reality because they controlled the media.

The viewpoint of the typical German citizen would have been negatively impacted in a variety of ways without a free press. Citizens would be more inclined to accept the official party line as fact if they were denied access to varied sources of information and the opportunity to read and hear alternative opinions. This might lead to people not thinking for themselves and being in the dark about what's happening in their nation. Potential negative outcomes include increased obedience and less willingness to speak out against the government. A society suffers when there is less of an opportunity for people to express their opinions and share their knowledge with others.