Question

Cloning humans has recently become a possibility that seems much more feasible in today's society than it was twenty years ago. The process used in cloning has been practiced on livestock for quite a few years with good results. The techniques have been proven to work, and with the rapid growth of technology in this field, human cloning can one day be very beneficial to our society. Human cloning has potential to save lives and make better the quality of life for future generations. This is why human cloning should not be banned. Source: Brown, Jason. "Human Cloning Should Not Be Banned."HumanCloning.org. Human Cloning Foundation, 18 Nov. 1998. Web. 6 Dec. 2010. Which of the following, if included in the rest of the article, could improve the objective reasoning of the article? facts to support the claims and opinions citations from other articles on the website emotional appeal from the author's own experience details of the author's opinions about cloning

Answer 1

The answer is (A) or facts to support claims or opinions.

Answer 2

Answer: A) facts to support the claims and opinions.

Step-by-step explanation: In the given excerpt from the article "Human Cloning Should Not Be Banned" we can be the description of some of the benefits that would have human cloning, and also the technology advances made in the last years. To improve the objective reasoning of the article, it should include facts to support the claims and opinions made about human cloning and how it would impact society.