107k views
0 votes
I know this is a lot but please help me 3 The second reason is that reform did not come until political pressure produced bans of certain UFC events. Ignoring public outcries of brutality was a huge faux pas. Damaging image problems and decreasing profits eventually motivated the UFC to work with state athletic commissions to give athletes a safer and fairer competition. We must keep pressure on the promoters. Even competitors with Herculean strength deserve a fair fight.

Select the rebuttal statement that BEST refutes a viewpoint in section three
A Early promoters of UFC events never worked with state athletic commissions.
B Early promoters of UFC events resisted working with state athletic commissions.
C Early promoters of UFC events were eager to work with state athletic commissions, without public pressure being a necessary inducement.
D Promoters of UFC events were eventually pressured to work with state athletic commissions.

User Gentle
by
7.5k points

2 Answers

4 votes

C Early promoters of UFC events were eager to work with state athletic commissions, without public pressure being a necessary inducement.

User David Lukac
by
7.7k points
1 vote
The correct answer is choice C. Promoters of UFC events were eager to work with state athletic commissions, without public pressure being a necessary inducement.
User Muhammad Shahab
by
7.2k points