215k views
2 votes
A scientist is studying a gene implicated in cancer in mice. She samples 14,000 mice and her p-value is 5%. What should her conclusion be?

User Holin
by
8.7k points

2 Answers

3 votes

Answer:

In conclusion the scientist should state that the data suggests that the gene causes cancer in mice.

Step-by-step explanation:

A p-value is a measure of significance, it is the probability of the findings giving a false-positive of the hypothesis. A p-value less than or equal to 0.005 (5%) is considered significant. In conclusion the scientist should state that the data suggests that the gene causes cancer in mice.

User Zverok
by
8.3k points
5 votes
The given values are 14,000 sample size and 5% p-value. Statistical significant results are achieved when p-value is less than the significance level. This shows a 95% confidence of results in the samples. The rejection region is composed of 5% of the sample distribution.
User Joshua Gleitze
by
7.6k points