Register
Why would a researcher use a primary source instead of a secondary source when analyzing a historical event?
79.0k views
0 votes
Why would a researcher use a primary source instead of a secondary source when analyzing a historical event?

User Alexhayes
by
6.9k points

1 Answer

3 votes
because you would want to have a better understanding and from some one who witnessed or they were involved in. Secondary is when you read about something in a book or article,you werent there to see it happen or to actually witness it.
User Sora
by
7.0k points
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

8.5m questions

11.1m answers

Other Questions

What goal of the constitution was also a goal of the Magna Carta?
is it true or false that after the american revolution conflicts in the northwest territory erupted between remaining british soldiers and native americans
Who made dutch claims in north america?
How did world war 1 affect the racial and ethnic makeup of american cities
What was an effect of nationalism in Europe in the early 1900s?
Link Copied!