219k views
1 vote
In _____________, the court expanded the practitioner's duty to warn those in danger to include the circumstance in which a family member communicates to a mental health practitioner a belief that the client poses a risk of grave bodily injury to another perso

User Jurrian
by
6.1k points

1 Answer

6 votes
In Ewing v. Goldstein,
the court expanded the practitioner's duty to warn those in danger to include the circumstance in which a family member communicates to a mental health practitioner a belief that the client poses a risk of grave bodily injury to another person
User TigrisC
by
6.6k points