What methods of constitutional interpretation do justices commonly use to decide cases?

Question

asked Feb 23, 2018 65.5k views

1 Answer

Hein Wessels · Answer 1 · 2018-03-01T23:19:17+0000

I would say that judges would most likely use precedent in cases of constitutional interpretation for support in coming up with a verdict and thus arrive at a verdict that was in accordance with an already accepted practice historically.

What methods of constitutional interpretation do justices commonly use to decide cases?

0 Comments

Please log in or register to add a comment.

Please log in or register to answer this question.

1 Answer

0 Comments

Please log in or register to add a comment.

No related questions found

Other Questions