Final answer:
Subjective information is based on personal judgments and attitudes, often reflecting the scientist's own feelings rather than empirical observations. Qualitative sociology relies on qualitative information, which provides depth but can also be error-prone and biased. Scientific research should focus on empirical evidence for greater accuracy and reliability.
Step-by-step explanation:
Information that depends more on the scientist's feelings and thoughts than on actual observations is said to be subjective. This type of information often arises from personal judgments, conclusions, or attitudes that may not necessarily be grounded in empirical evidence. Rather than being based on objectively gathered data, this qualitative information comprises narratives and explanations that reflect qualitative sociology studies. Such data are crucial as they provide depth to understanding human behavior and social phenomena, but they are also challenging because they can be inadequate to the facts and mixed with error and nonsense. With the aim of reducing bias and enhancing reliability, scientific research should emphasize data that comes from direct experience or scientifically gathered data, referred to as empirical evidence.