109k views
1 vote
Yes it is a multiple choice question. Which of the following best states an interpretation of the Second Amendment?

No one should be able to own or use a gun.
Only local governments can pass gun laws.
Guns should only be used for hunting.
There should be no limits on owning and using guns.

2 Answers

4 votes

Answer:

An interpretation of the Second Amendment is that there should be no limits on owning and using guns.

Step-by-step explanation:

The Second Amendment to the United States Constitution is part of the Bill of Rights, which was added to the Constitution on December 15, 1791. The amendment prohibits the government from violating the natural right to own and carry weapons. The modern interpretation to be given to the amendment provides an extensive and polarized debate within American society.

User Huy Hoang
by
7.4k points
3 votes

The correct answer is D) There should be no limits on owning and using guns.

The Second Amendment does not specifically discuss what guns should be owned or what guns can be used by American citizens. This can be considered a product of the time, as this amendment was adopted in the late 1700's, where technology and guns were extremely simple in comparison to today's weapons.

User Kshah
by
6.8k points