We can definitely rule out (D) and (C) as a model with a negative concavity will be the perfect graph in order to model these events.
Now, let's look at (A) and (B) and compare these two.
(A) suggests that the melting ice takes nine hours to completely seep into the ground, and so, we can say that the y-axis represent the weight and this is a perfectly viable graph to do so.
(B) suggests that this graph can be used to represent temperature cooling down to room temperature. However, from temperature graphs, we know that temperature cools down faster when it's hotter moreso when it's around room temperature.
In order to understand this, we need to understand how turning a thermometer reacts with changes in the environment. When the difference between two temperatures is greater, the rate at which the thermometer is trying to pick up will react faster.
This essentially comes back to Newton's Law of Cooling, and so, this isn't the best suited graph to represent temperature changes.