Question

If a new body of evidence were found that directly contradicted the cell theory, groups of scientists would then _________ ?

Answer 1

When confronted with new evidence that contradicts established theories like cell theory, scientists would think of ways to test the new ideas using the scientific method, rather than disregarding or selectively choosing evidence.

Step-by-step explanation:

If a new body of evidence were found that directly contradicted the cell theory, groups of scientists would then think of a way to test the idea. This process is emblematic of the scientific method, where hypotheses and theories must be continually tested against new evidence. Rather than ignoring or rejecting evidence, or seeking only supporting information, scientists are expected to critically evaluate new findings and, if necessary, revise or abandon old theories.

This principle is what maintains the advancement of scientific knowledge and ensures that our understanding of the world remains based on the most current and reliable evidence. For instance, in the history of science, there have been numerous instances where established theories were challenged by new evidence.

Answer 2

Answer: The correct answer for the fill in the blank is - group of scientists would then revise the theory either by excluding the rules, which are not fulfilled by all life forms or they will make editions in the existing rule by putting the exceptions of those life forms.

Thus, if evidences from new body contradicts the cell theory, scientists would revise the theory.