Question

two scientists observe a plant growing without any water added to the soil. Doctor Allen offers the hypothesis that this species of plant must derive water from the atmosphere. Doctor Bateman does not agree, instead hypothesizing that plans must keep water in its roots so it can survive when droughts occur. What does this situation demonstrate about the formation of scientific knowledge? a. Whenever experts contradict each other, it points to a basic flaw in the theory. b. Disagreement and conflict are a natural part of scientific research. c. Experts should not publicize their findings until they are sure they are correct. d. Whenever strange results are observed, it is best to create a theory before testing it.

Answer 1

This situation demonstrates that disagreement and conflict are a natural part of scientific research.

Step-by-step explanation:

This situation demonstrates that disagreement and conflict are a natural part of scientific research. When two scientists have different hypotheses about how a plant can grow without water added to the soil, it shows that there is not always a consensus or agreement in scientific knowledge. Scientists may have differing interpretations or perspectives, and this can lead to debates and further research to determine the most accurate explanation.

Answer 2

In the journey of creating a scientific theory, it is expected that peer scientists also try to disprove the theory, this is done in order to find any possible flaws to the explanation and the hypothesis. After the disprove attempt, the theory can move forward to possibly become a well-recognized theory. Letter B is the best answer for this question