214k views
5 votes
Explain how the Bill Of Rights can be considered a compromise between Federalist and Anti - Federalist.

User Romkey
by
8.2k points

1 Answer

3 votes
One of the many points of contention between Federalists and Anti-Federalists was the Constitution’s lack of a bill of rights that would place specific limits on government power. Federalists argued that the Constitution did not need a bill of rights, because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty.
User Paceman
by
8.6k points