Final answer:
The passages provided illustrate the President's capability to use alternative methods like joint resolutions to accomplish foreign policy goals, the Constitution's flexibility in allowing the President and Congress to respond to crises, and the War Powers Resolution's intent to limit presidential military action. Additionally, the Secretary of State is the appointee responsible for foreign affairs.
Step-by-step explanation:
The excerpt illustrates that a treaty is not the only tool a President can use to make agreements with other countries. When President John Tyler and President William McKinley encountered resistance in treaty-making with the Senate, they both encouraged the passage of a joint resolution, requiring only a majority vote in each house, to achieve the annexation of Texas and Hawaii, respectively. This highlights the president's ability to utilize alternative legislative methods to accomplish foreign policy objectives.
Based on the statement regarding Congress's resolutions authorizing military force, the strongest conclusion is that the Constitution is flexible enough to allow Congress and the President to meet crises in a variety of ways. Congress has authorized the use of military force through joint resolutions rather than formal declarations of war since World War II.
The intent of the section from the War Powers Resolution of 1973 is to limit the President's power to commit the U.S. to military action without satisfying certain conditions, such as a declaration of war, specific statutory authorization, or a national emergency triggered by an attack on the United States.
The individual the President appoints to deal mainly with foreign policy is the Secretary of State.