Final answer:
In contrast to John McCrae's 'In Flanders Fields,' which serves as a call to arms, Edna Jacques' 'In Flanders Now' reflects on peace and the fulfilled promises made to the fallen soldiers of World War I.
Step-by-step explanation:
The narrator of In Flanders Fields is assumed to be the collective voice of the soldiers who fell in battle during World War I, expressing their legacy and a call to the living to carry on the fight. In contrast, Edna Jacques' poem In Flanders Now adopts a perspective that reflects on the peace that now rests in Flanders, where once there was war. While McCrae's poem is often associated with the remembrance of the war dead and the poppies that bloom on their graves, Jacques' poem speaks to the future, honoring the promise made to those who died by maintaining peace. The main difference between the two poems lies in the tone: John McCrae's work is predominantly a rousing call to arms, whereas Jacques' is a reflection on the fulfillment of that call, with peace as the ultimate outcome.