143k views
5 votes
On the night of September 2, 1666, the King’s baker did not completely put out the embers in his oven. After he went to bed, the embers ignited a stack of nearby wood. Soon the baker’s shop and house were ablaze. Most of the buildings in London at that time were made of wood, pitch, and thatch, which caused the fire to spread rapidly. The fire burned for days, and by the time it burned itself out, 80 percent of the city was destroyed. Amazingly, few people died in the fire. The one benefit of the fire was that it killed most of the rats that had been causing the plague. The author views the fire as one of the worst disasters in history. Which supporting detail best demonstrates that viewpoint? A)The buildings in London were made of flammable material. B)Eighty percent of the city was destroyed. C)Few people died in the fire. D)he fire killed all the rats that were causing the plague.

User Sohail Si
by
5.7k points

1 Answer

3 votes
the answer is B because it supports the fact that what occurred was tragic whereas the other answers do not
User Alexey Grigorev
by
6.4k points