Final answer:
Senator Beveridge advocated for American imperialism, believing the U.S. was destined to govern territories such as the Philippines. He saw colonization as beneficial for military strategy and commerce, whereas the Negro National Democratic League opposed annexation based on the universal right to liberty and self-government.
Step-by-step explanation:
The statements that reflect the point of view Senator Beveridge expresses in "March of the Flag" are primarily those that align with his support for American imperialism and the benefits he sees in US-occupied territories. From his perspective, colonization by the United States would bring governance and civilization to territories deemed incapable of self-governing, such as the Philippines. Beveridge also justifies expansionism as the United States' rightful role in bringing order and administration to 'savage and senile peoples.' Additionally, he argues that colonization brings strategic value in military and commerce, particularly as a gateway to Asian markets, augmenting American economic interests. In contrast, the Negro National Democratic League's opposition to annexation is based on the principle that all peoples are entitled to liberty and self-government, regardless of racial background or geographic location.
Senator Beveridge saw the United States as a governing power destined to administer territories like the Philippines, a perspective coupling ideology and economic interests. He believed that colonization benefits US-occupied territories and that the United States should colonize the Philippines. These views were in stark contrast to those who believed that colonization goes against the principles of self-government and the inherent right of all people to govern themselves.