Question

Ethical criteria for judging appropriate conduct define select one:

a. what is wise based on trying to understand the efficacy of the tactic and the consequences it might have on the relationship with the other.
b. what a negotiator can actually make happen in a given situation.
c. what is appropriate as determined by some standard of moral conduct.
d. what the law defines as acceptable practice.
e. all of the above are defined by ethical criteria for judging appropriate conduct.

Answer 1

The ethical criteria for judging appropriate conduct are defined by different approaches in normative ethics: consequentialist, deontological, and virtue ethics.

Step-by-step explanation:

The ethical criteria for judging appropriate conduct are defined by different approaches in normative ethics: consequentialist, deontological, and virtue ethics.

In consequentialism, the moral rightness of an action is determined by its outcome or consequences. Consequentialists believe that an action is right if it produces the greatest good.

In deontological ethics, the focus is on duties or rules. An action is considered morally right if it follows the correct rule or duty, regardless of the consequences.

In virtue ethics, the emphasis is on character and the development of the right habits or traits. Virtue ethicists argue that the right action flows from the right character.

Therefore, the answer to your question is that all of the above are defined by ethical criteria for judging appropriate conduct.

Answer 2

C : What is appropriate as determined by some standard of moral conduct.