168k views
1 vote
When evaluating past eras, historians depend on primary documents and other resources to understand events and cultures. For instance, it would be difficult to evaluate why people once thought Earth was at the center of the solar system unless you analyzed documents from the time in which the idea was relevant.

What difficulties do you think might arise when trying to understand ideas from the past, especially when those ideas are so different from our modern thinking? Do you think primary resources show a complete picture of the period they are from? Give an example or two to illustrate your answer.

1 Answer

4 votes
We weren't there to experience it. A lot of the time, we use journals to learn parts of History. that doesn't mean it's exact information. We could never know whether it's true information or not. Since we're used to what we live in today, It could be hard for people to understand what happens in thd past, since their technology wasn't as advanced as it is today. Seeing the primary resources and technology that a time period uses definitely does show us the time period, or at least gives us a rough estimate.
User Adolphus
by
5.4k points