For this case we have the following inequality:
![|x-2| - 1 \ \textgreater \ 2](https://img.qammunity.org/2019/formulas/mathematics/college/c40er9wqp1h3g06sa1fu6gl4tio8mys686.png)
We can rewrite the inequality as follows:
![|x-2| \ \textgreater \ 3](https://img.qammunity.org/2019/formulas/mathematics/college/cfhdk6qgxynvki23fbmnpip1ms4r1y20gv.png)
From here, we have two possible cases:
Case 1:
![x-2 \ \textgreater \ 3](https://img.qammunity.org/2019/formulas/mathematics/college/yll8ww6v7ttffntho343213i4xo9sz0l0s.png)
Case 2:
![x-2 \ \textless \ -3](https://img.qammunity.org/2019/formulas/mathematics/college/2d18r2c4bn8suoa2bsipktc3kp3o977t2a.png)
Therefore, graphically, it is observed that the solution is:
(5, ∞)
(-∞, -1)
To do this, we must observe the shaded region in the graph, or equivalently the numerical line.
Answer:
(5, ∞)
(-∞, -1)
See attached image for the graphic solution