47.4k views
1 vote
You are investigating the role of physical activity in heart disease, and your data suggest a protective effect. Whilepresenting your findings, a colleague asks whether you have thought about confounders, such as factor. Under which ofthe following conditions could this factor have confounded your interpretation of the data?a. It is a risk factor for some other disease, but not heart disease.b. It is a risk factor associated with the physical activity measure and heart disease.c. It is part of the causal pathway by which physical activity affects heart disease.d. It has caused a lack of follow-up of test subjects.e. It may have blinded your study.

User Yuval
by
7.9k points

1 Answer

3 votes

Answer: option E - It may have blinded your study.

Step-by-step explanation:

A confounder is a factor, in data analysis, that causes the effects of two distinct processes to be indistinguishable/ unknown.

Of course, the confounder (factor) could have made the protective effect against heart disease a function of more than just physical activity - bringing other factors like heredity or diet history etc into consideration.

So, the confounder (factor) may have blinded your study.

User Nunopolonia
by
8.4k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.