184k views
3 votes
Dole and Randy each purchased homes in a subdivision of 346 homes. They agreed to the subdivision restrictions that said no large animals may be kept. Several years later, the 8-year-old daughter of Randy asked for a pony. Randy obtained the proper building permits and constructed a beautiful barn and white rail fence to house the new animal. The daughter was very happy until Dole insisted they get rid of the pony. Could Dole force Randy to remove the pony from the property?

A) Yes. Dole could force them to comply with the restrictions in the deed.B) Yes. Dole has a legal obligation to report the existence of the pony to the appropriate governmental agency.C) No. Since Dole did not adjoin Rand's property, Dole was not an interested party.D) No--since the action was not taken prior to the issuance of the building permits.

User Arkadi
by
6.1k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

No--since the action was not taken prior to the issuance of the building permits.

Randy obtained the proper building permits and constructed a beautiful barn and white rail fence to house the new animal.

User JMabee
by
5.1k points