Answer:
a) There is not enough evidence to claim that the mean number of complaints is less than 15 per month.
1)
![H_0: \mu\geq15](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/mathematics/college/c3rt50k18rtrasurwlcl4vb51oios1fdty.png)
2)
![H_1: \mu<15](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/mathematics/college/nt6u5h91bnq45s0u0q0ul1fu45iizvyo7m.png)
3)
![\alpha=0.05](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/mathematics/college/o3op132eurfz836qnoznjuckj0omh3ecx4.png)
4)
![z=-1.02](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/mathematics/college/nl2bfl1vsrwevn8zgb8k9ju8qradq4oukl.png)
5)
![P=0.15386](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/mathematics/college/f8vokwmr0xbzlysavh7cp9rurknqig4kjh.png)
6) Failed to reject the null hypothesis, because the P-value is greater than the significance level.
7) The sample, although has a mean that is less than 15, is not as different from 15 to be an odd result. It is still the normal sample we can get if the real number of complaints is 15 per month.
b) Yes. We are assuming that the sample means are distributed normally around 15. In other words, we are assuming a sampling distribution that is approximate normal.
c) The histogram shows normality in the distribution of the data. The correct way to prove it is with a normal test plot in which, when the data is graphed, a straight line shows normality.
Explanation:
a) We have to perform a hypothesis test, with level of significance of α=0.05 and this null and alternative hypothesis:
![H_0: \mu\geq15\\\\H_1: \mu<15](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/mathematics/college/x7iyhpkybseufia1si4732h1v4k3ga8lq1.png)
The data has a sample mean of 13.5 and a s.d. of 1.467.
We can calculate the statistic z as
![z=(13.5-15)/(1.467)=(-1.5)/(1.467)= -1.02](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/mathematics/college/l07zlupk495umdzxguokdlqeroc7f1hljq.png)
The P-value of z=-1.02 is P(z<-1.02)=0.15.
The P-value (0.15) is greater than the significance level (0.05), so the effect is not significant and it failed to reject the null hypothesis.