83.0k views
2 votes
If there is no direct evidence of an agreement to manipulate the competitive market between two CEOs, a prosecutor may use their calendars and subsequent actions that were not in the usual course of business as circumstantial evidence to prove the ________ requirement of an antitrust violation

a) meeting-of-the-minds
b) price-fixing
c) vertical restraint
d) horizontal restraint

User SMor
by
7.5k points

1 Answer

0 votes

Answer:

a) meeting-of-the-minds

Step-by-step explanation:

Meeting-of-the-minds denotes intention of the parties entering into the contract.

Note: The previous concept is also referred to as mutual agreement. is a phrase in contract law used to describe the intentions of the persons forming the contract.

It refers to the situation where there is a common understanding in the formation of the contract.

User Lordking
by
7.7k points