124k views
4 votes
Premises: If a person has insufficient vitamin K, there will be a prothrombin deficiency. Mr. Keene does not have a prothrombin deficiency

User Charybr
by
4.7k points

1 Answer

4 votes

Answer:

The conclusion is Mr. Keene has sufficient vitamin K.

Explanation:

Consider the provided statement.

The law of detachment involves two quantities, one is hypothesis and another is conclusion.

In the provided statement hypotheses and conclusion is:

Hypotheses (P): Person has insufficient vitamin K

Conclusion (Q): There will be a prothrombin deficiency.

Here if a person has insufficient vitamin K that means there must be prothrombin deficiency, but if a person has prothrombin deficiency we can't say anything.

Now it is given that Mr. Keene does not have a prothrombin deficiency.

That means he has sufficient vitamin K

Hence, the conclusion is Mr. Keene has sufficient vitamin K.

The required diagram is shown in figure.

Premises: If a person has insufficient vitamin K, there will be a prothrombin deficiency-example-1
User Sanjay Mistry
by
5.5k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.