First of all, let's prove that
![x+(1)/(x)\geq 2,\quad x>0](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/mathematics/middle-school/txhxvxp85y9qb3dyr9wdmfooxw7p39kpxj.png)
We can rewrite the fraction as
![(x^2+1)/(x)](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/mathematics/middle-school/cgi05flso3c5htcjdnij4qcwoyzh9i86ae.png)
And the inequality as
![(x^2+1)/(x)-2\geq 0](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/mathematics/middle-school/cqwio597273u5aughfyuoz9l1a56dxzfjf.png)
Again, we can rewrite as
![(x^2-2x+1)/(x)\geq 0 \iff ((x-1)^2)/(x)\geq 0](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/mathematics/middle-school/c03h4m325lz4h67khbfyen4mziykn5np11.png)
The numerator is a square, so it is always greater than or equal to zero.
The denominator is positive, because we're assuming x>0.
So, this is a fraction between positive numbers, and it is always positive, and the first part is finished.
As for the second part, we have
![x^2+(1)/(x^2) \geq x+(1)/(x) \iff x^2+(1)/(x^2)-x-(1)/(x) \geq 0 \iff ((x - 1)^2 (x^2 + x + 1))/(x^2) \geq 0](https://img.qammunity.org/2020/formulas/mathematics/middle-school/iamd4ajug52yoo750jrh57bm204ur7us34.png)
The numerator is not the product of a square (always greater than or equal to zero) and a quadratic equation with no solutions and positive leading coefficient (always positive), so it's always greater than or equal to zero. The denominator is x^2, and since x>0 by hypothesis, it is positive. This ends the proof.