Answer:
We cannot say that the braking distance for SUVs equipped with tires using compound 1 is shorter than the braking distance when compound 2 is used
Explanation:
If we call
=true mean braking distance corresponding to compound 1
=true mean braking distance corresponding to compound 2
=mean of the sample for compound 1
=mean of the sample for compound 2
In this case we have the following hypothesis


The level of confidence is 0.05, so the region of rejection is represented in picture 1
(See picture attached).
Let's find the z-score corresponding to this data and if this value is < -1.64, then we can say that the braking distance for SUVs equipped with tires using compound 1 is shorter than the braking distance when compound 2 is used.

where
s1=standard deviation braking distance corresponding to the sample for compound 1
s2=standard deviation braking distance corresponding to the sample for compound 2
n=sample size
So,

Since -1.5051 is not < -1.64, we cannot refute H0 and say that the braking distance for SUVs equipped with tires using compound 1 is shorter than the braking distance when compound 2 is used.