Final answer:
Lena might be required to engage in Alternative Dispute Resolution before going to trial. The requirement for ADR depends on the specific rules of the federal court district and the nature of the case. ADR is often used to resolve disputes efficiently, although the right to a jury trial can be waived.
Step-by-step explanation:
Lena has been informed that her lawsuit is in federal district court and is wondering about the necessity of using Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) before going to trial. In the federal court system, parties are often encouraged, and sometimes required, to seek ADR mechanisms like mediation and arbitration. Not all cases may require ADR before trial, but it is increasingly becoming common practice to include ADR in the legal process in an effort to efficiently resolve disputes and relieve pressure on the court system. While there is a constitutional right to a jury trial in civil cases at the federal level, parties can waive this right. Small claims courts or certain local rules may have different procedures where a judge alone decides the case. Thus, whether Lena is required by law to use ADR before going to court can depend on the specific rules of the federal district court handling her case and the nature of her legal issue.