Register
In the Middle Ages , why would written libel be potentially more harmful than spoken libel?
42.8k views
1 vote
In the Middle Ages , why would written libel be potentially more harmful than spoken libel?

User TheFungusAmongUs
by
7.2k points

1 Answer

5 votes

Answer: Written defamation/libel could be used as a cause of action in ecclesiastical courts, so they were considered spiritually damaging.

Step-by-step explanation:

User En
by
7.5k points
Ask a Question
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.

7.6m questions

10.2m answers

Other Questions

What goal of the constitution was also a goal of the Magna Carta?
is it true or false that after the american revolution conflicts in the northwest territory erupted between remaining british soldiers and native americans
Who made dutch claims in north america?
What was an effect of nationalism in Europe in the early 1900s?
What were the positive and negative effects of Egypt being imperialized by Britain.
Link Copied!