Explanation:
As the hint says, for any function
, we can think of the set
(which is the set of all those elements of
which don't belong to their image). So
is made of elements of
, and so it belongs to
.
Now, this set
is NOT the image of any element in
, since if there was some
such that
, then the following would happen:
If
, then by definition of the set
,
, so we're getting that
and also
, which is a contradiction.
On the other hand, if
, then by definition of the set
, we would get that
, so we're getting that
and also
, which is a contradiction again.
So in any case, the assumption that this set
is the image of some element in
leads us to a contradiction, therefore this set
is NOT the image of any element in
, and so there cannot be a bijection from
to
, and so the two sets cannot have the same cardinality.