47.6k views
3 votes
According to the FBI Bank Crime​ Statistics, there were more than​ 4,000 bank robberies in the United States in​ 2015, an increase of 3.9 percent over 2014. The FBI claims that banks have made themselves easy targets by refusing to install clear acrylic​ partitions, called bandit barriers​, that separate bank tellers from the public. According to a special agent with the​ FBI, ​"Bandit barriers are a great deterrent.​ We've talked to guys who rob​ banks, and as soon as they see a bandit​ barrier, they go find another​ bank." ​Sources: U.S. Department of​ Justice, Federal Bureau of​ Investigation, "Bank Crime Statistics​ 2015," and​ "Bank Crime Statistics ​2014"​; and Richard​ Cowen, "FBI: Banks Are to Blame for Rise in​ Robberies," NorthJersey​, March​ 10, 2009. Despite this​ finding, many banks have been reluctant to install these barriers.​ Wouldn't banks have a strong incentive to install bandit barriers to deter​ robberies? Why,​ then, do so many banks not do​ so?

User Zonky
by
5.1k points

1 Answer

2 votes

Answer:

Probably because the costs of doing so.

Explanation:

Even though the findings are that bandit barriers are a great deterrent to stop bank robberies, the banks would have to spend a lot of money on installing them in all their banks, which would make a great amount of money spent on this and therefore would be losing money.

User Caelea
by
5.5k points
Welcome to QAmmunity.org, where you can ask questions and receive answers from other members of our community.