Question

Imagine that you design and conduct an experiment based on your hypothesis that adding fertilizer to soil allows more plants to grow. You find that more plants grew in the soil with fertilizer than the soil without fertilizer. As a scientist, you would _________.

Answer 1

After experimenting, a scientist would analyze the data, draw conclusions, and then communicate their results to the scientific community.

Step-by-step explanation:

As a scientist, after finding that more plants grew in the soil with fertilizer than the soil without fertilizer, you would analyze the results and draw conclusions. This involves looking at your data to see whether it supports or contradicts your hypothesis. If the data supports your hypothesis, you may consider testing it further with more experiments or in different conditions to increase the robustness of your findings.

On the other hand, if the data does not support your hypothesis, you may need to refine or revise the hypothesis, or perhaps develop a new one, and then test that new hypothesis. Ultimately, after drawing conclusions, you would communicate your results to the scientific community for review and further study, often by publishing in scientific journals or presenting at conferences.

Answer 2

You would have to change your hypothesis.

Step-by-step explanation:

Experiments can always go "wrong", but they are important because they provide evidence that maybe is not the fertilizer the variable that is influencing plant growth. After this you could change the experiment taking into account new variables such as pH, amount of water or sunlight etc.