Question

According to many, the digital world is being divided into ‘haves’ and ‘have nots’ – between those that have access and can use a computer and the Internet, and those that do not have such access. Some believe that this creates serious ethical implications and that there is a moral obligation to do something about the disparity; the ‘have nots’ may well feel discriminated against or feel ‘socially excluded’ and are missing out on many life opportunities. Do you feel that everyone everywhere should have access to computers and the Internet, regardless of location, need, competency, or ability to pay? If yes, who should provide the services and education and who should pick up the tab? If no, explain why not everyone needs access to the Internet.

Answer 1

I believe that everyone should have access to computers and the Internet, regardless of location, need, competency, or ability to pay. I think that it is a moral obligation to provide access to the Internet to everyone. The ‘have nots’ may well feel discriminated against or feel ‘socially excluded’ and are missing out on many life opportunities.

I think that the government should provide the services and education and pick up the tab. I think that it is the government’s responsibility to make sure that everyone has access to the Internet.

Step-by-step explanation: